SELLING YOUR SOUL
A Review of Andrew Kimbrell's The
Human Body Shop
When
we hear someone has sold their soul, we think perhaps of a demon and a guy
named Faust or maybe of a Marxist classmate (er, I mean schoolmate) who took a
job serving corporate interests to make big money. Similarly, the thought of someone selling
their body conjures up images of drug-woozy prostitutes on Tenth Avenue. We feel sorry for these people because they
have given up a very important part of themselves.
But,
as Andrew Kimbrell forcefully argues in The Human Body Shop, Harper
Collins (1993) our society has put itself on a slippery slope in which in which
many “respectable” people also sell parts of themselves and/or place their body
parts in a market to be sold by well-paid, high tech merchants. Although
society has legitimized these sales, Kimbrell asks whether it is any less
destructive of humanity to have people sell parts of themselves than it would
be in the Faustian context or in the conventionally-defined realm of
prostitution.
He
begins by discussing blood donations and sales. While we take these practices
for granted, they have only been common since the late 1940s. For millennia
before that, blood was considered mystical and personal. Now, many people donate blood or blood “components.” In
Somoza’s Nicaragua, blood was repeatedly taken from political prisoners and
exported for profit. In America, we’re
more enlightened. Instead of holding
people down and sticking needles in their arms, we provide market incentives
like high rents to induce “voluntary” donations. So many Americans sell their blood plasma
that America is known as the OPEC of blood plasma.
Organ
transplantation has created a demand for a pool of “serviceable” organs. Organ donations were scarce until the early
1980s, in large part because the
recipients seldom survived. In China,
organs from executed political prisoners are sold for profit. And many poor people “voluntarily” sell
organs. Wealthy expatriates go to India to buy kidneys from poor natives. Some advocate increasing organ donations by
paying people to agree to yield organs upon death. A generation inured to such practices may
only be able to literally interpret songs like “My Heart Belongs to You” or “I Left my Heart in San Francisco.” OK, so these tunes are kind of schmaltzy, but what fulfillment is there when love and
devotion are considered just a manifestation of biochemicals and social
constructs? Crank up the Nirvana. Pass
the Everclear and the shotgun.
Taking
organ donation one horrific step beyond, abortion clinics have often sold
aborted human fetuses so that fetal parts can be used in medical
experiments. Sorry, but I can’t joke
about that.
Kimbrell
discusses sperm and egg sales and womb rentals (a.k.a., surrogate motherhood).
In our society, many people don’t think twice about the ontological questions
raised by these reproductive technologies.
Sperm banks are prime comedian fodder.
But exalting fun can diminish joy.
A
casual approach to reproduction has huge human costs. In addition to the immediate pain associated
with egg donation, many women who donate eggs experience fertility problems of
their own from the difficult process of egg extraction and subsequent
psychological problems because wonder what became of “their” child. Early returns show that many of the marriages
of children conceived from donated gametes are strained because the parents
don’t share equally in the child’s being. Kimbrell observes that many of the
children born of what he calls “technological adultery” have profound identity
crises and a depressing sense that their “parent” was willing to sell them for
a fee.
The
final frontier in, or affront, presented by, the human body market is genetic
engineering. Human and animal genes and entire animals themselves are being
patented. Further, genetic testing
provides information-- including gender-- that enables parents to select which
embryos they will allow to be born and which they will throw away, perhaps to
be profitably recycled by the pregnancy Terminator. Researchers are striving to develop
techniques that allow them to modify people’s genetic heritage by, for example,
attaching gene sequences to injectable viruses.
Hey, guys, take the week off.
Kimbrell
explains that the commodification of humans is the result of the confluence of
two forces, market economics and reductionist science, that, although
relatively recent additions to human history, have become the gods of many. We
are taught to revere market advocates like Smith and Locke, and scientists like
Galileo, Newton and Kepler. But Kimbrell
opines that they have hurt humanity more than they have helped because, when
people are viewed, and view themselves, as machines, they can do terrible things
to each other. A chief element of military combat training is to persuade
soldiers that their enemies are inhuman. If one thinks of human beings as
machines, why should one feel sorrow when a bus or plane full of such machines
is “put out of service?”
I
have often donated blood and, until recently, I had willed all of my organs for
transplantation. But, after considering the commodification of body parts, the
growth of the medical juggernaut and the disturbing emergence of the reprotech
and bioengineering industries, I am rethinking these decisions. Lives should have a natural life span, and,
in a world where hundreds of millions of people lack enough to eat or clean
water to drink, more lives could be saved if the dollars and effort that were
spent on these efforts to tamper with life were spent instead to better the
lives of the poor.
Besides,
it will give people one less reason to run me over with their cars.