TALKING THE TALK
Discussing with Children the
Origins of Life
It's
almost time to discuss with my nine year old son how he came into being. Like any reasonably observant kid his age
who's seen a little PBS and been in a few schoolyards, I suspect he's processed
enough information about the logistics of reproduction that I may just be
filling in some gaps and answering a few questions.
My
larger task will be helping him to ascribe meaning to the beginning of life in
order to enable him to attach meaning to the human experience as a whole. If this seems too ambitious, I have another, more modest goal in discussing
human sexuality with him: to prevent him from becoming the kind of adolescent
portrayed on Fox TV or the kind of adult that shows up on Jerry Springer.
I
was kind of looking forward to this talk, too.
I figured it would be another of those experiences we could share, like
teaching him how to ride a bike, catch a baseball or throw a hammer when he
messes up a home improvement project. I
planned to walk downtown with him one night for a big ice cream cone and tell
him how every person is part Mommy, part Daddy, part God and part destiny.
But
recently, after living for four decades and having fathered three kids, I have
learned more about how babies are manufactured by a growing industry that
retails eggs and sperm, performs artificial conception, selectively destroys
embryos that have undesirable
characteristics (like the "wrong" gender) and hopes soon to alter the
genes of babies to be. Now, instead of
being able to answer his questions, I have questions of my own.
Is
it ok for a parent to make a child into a concert pianist or baseball player
against the child's will? Is it ok for a
pregnant mother to use cocaine or alcohol? Doesn't life have intrinsic value,
irrespective of parental wishes? If it's
ok to abort a fetus because it's not yet a person, who are adults undergoing
artificial conception to benefit, a being that does not exist, or
themselves?
In
serving the individual interests of those who want to artificially conceive
children, are we doing something very negative to the larger society in which
all people live? Will the birth of
babies become less cause for joy as babies become an entitlement and, through
embryo selection or modification, child bearing resembles a trip to
Wal-Mart? Will society become even more
stratified as the rich purchase genetic advantages for their offspring? If
baby-making components can be shipped through the mail and babies can be
assembled or terminated in a lab, why shouldn't people view themselves and
others as commodities? If they do,
should we expect them to feel guilty about bombing buses or shooting up
schools?
I
expect my son to ask himself some of those same questions in the next few years
as these issues come closer to home.
Several weeks ago, for example, he and my six year old daughter and I
were at the community pool when we were approached by my daughter's six year
old friend who, my daughter told me, "has two mommies." Looking at me, her friend said, "Oh,
there's your Daddy." My daughter asked, innocently enough, "Who's
your Daddy? (Pause) What's your
Daddy?" I wondered, "Is this
why they invented mint-flavored Prozac?"
The
arrogance of youth has, for years, allowed us to believe that, even if our
parents were smoother dancers than we were, we were hipper, more enlightened
and rational than they. I just wonder
how we're going to create a world better than-- or even as good as-- theirs, when those who inhabit it have no
sense of surprise, no sense of magic, no sense of our place in nature and no
sense that those who cross their paths each day are anything more than slightly
refined bovine DNA.
Would
the Greatest Generation have stormed Normandy to secure the future of something
that could be made in a lab? Would the
Mother Teresas of the world have devoted their lives to serving their genetic
tribes? Who are we saving this earth for, anyway?
And
what kind of place will this be to raise kids?